Run a data mining experiment to test an assumption. Systematically searches web and workspace evidence, sets success criteria upfront, and produces a structured experiment report.
Use when
Saved references to every source consulted — URLs, publications, data sets — so future research can build on this work rather than repeating it.
Specific findings from each source, each classified as supporting or contradicting the assumption being tested, with reasoning.
A structured record of the experiment: question, success criteria, methodology, findings summary, result, and recommended next steps.
Write the question, set explicit success criteria, and document the methodology before searching for anything. Setting success criteria first is what prevents confirmation bias.
Search existing evidence sources so you do not redo research that has already been done — prior work is often more relevant than a fresh web search.
Use specific, falsifiable queries — not queries designed to confirm your hypothesis. Look for data that could prove the assumption wrong as much as data that supports it.
Save each source and finding with a clear stance on whether it supports or contradicts the assumption. Summarize the experiment result and recommended next steps.
Unstructured research has a well-documented bias problem: you find evidence that confirms what you already believe. Data mining experiments are different because they require you to set success criteria before you start searching — what would supported look like? What would refuted look like? Then you search systematically for evidence that could go either way. The result is an experiment report that captures not just what you found, but what you were looking for and why the evidence supports or contradicts the assumption.
Most valuable after a pre-mortem or hypothesis refinement session has identified specific assumptions to test. Works best when the assumption is specific and falsifiable — vague assumptions produce inconclusive results.